GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP Annual Cost of Revenue in USD from 2010 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
The aggregate cost of goods produced and sold and services rendered during the reporting period.
Summary
Geospace Technologies Corp quarterly/annual Cost of Revenue history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023.
  • Geospace Technologies Corp Cost of Revenue for the quarter ending June 30, 2024 was $17.3M, a 7.49% decline year-over-year.
  • Geospace Technologies Corp Cost of Revenue for the twelve months ending June 30, 2024 was $78.6M, a 1.13% increase year-over-year.
  • Geospace Technologies Corp annual Cost of Revenue for 2023 was $72.8M, a 2.26% increase from 2022.
  • Geospace Technologies Corp annual Cost of Revenue for 2022 was $71.2M, a 9.37% decline from 2021.
  • Geospace Technologies Corp annual Cost of Revenue for 2021 was $78.6M, a 22% increase from 2020.
Cost of Revenue, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Cost of Revenue, Annual (USD)
Cost of Revenue, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $72.8M +$1.61M +2.26% Oct 1, 2022 Sep 30, 2023 10-K 2023-11-17
2022 $71.2M -$7.36M -9.37% Oct 1, 2021 Sep 30, 2022 10-K 2023-11-17
2021 $78.6M +$14.2M +22% Oct 1, 2020 Sep 30, 2021 10-K 2022-11-18
2020 $64.4M +$22K +0.03% Oct 1, 2019 Sep 30, 2020 10-K 2021-11-19
2019 $64.4M -$395K -0.61% Oct 1, 2018 Sep 30, 2019 10-K 2020-11-20
2018 $64.8M -$29.6M -31.4% Oct 1, 2017 Sep 30, 2018 10-K 2019-11-22
2017 $94.4M +$13M +15.9% Oct 1, 2016 Sep 30, 2017 10-K 2018-11-16
2016 $81.4M -$14.6M -15.2% Oct 1, 2015 Sep 30, 2016 10-K 2018-11-16
2015 $96.1M -$44.4M -31.6% Oct 1, 2014 Sep 30, 2015 10-K 2017-12-01
2014 $140M -$20.4M -12.7% Oct 1, 2013 Sep 30, 2014 10-K 2016-11-17
2013 $161M +$51.2M +46.8% Oct 1, 2012 Sep 30, 2013 10-K 2015-11-19
2012 $110M +$10.7M +10.9% Oct 1, 2011 Sep 30, 2012 10-K 2014-11-21
2011 $98.9M +$17.7M +21.8% Oct 1, 2010 Sep 30, 2011 10-K 2013-11-22
2010 $81.2M Oct 1, 2009 Sep 30, 2010 10-K 2012-12-12
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.