JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense CNY 2010 - 2023

Historical data

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: CNY
Description
Amount of expense for award under share-based payment arrangement. Excludes amount capitalized.
Summary
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. annual/quarterly Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023.
  • JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the quarter ending May 14, 2010 was ¥14.7 M.
  • JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2023 was ¥863 M, a 13.8% decline from 2022.
  • JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2022 was ¥1 B, a 10026% increase from 2021.
  • JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2021 was ¥9.88 M, a 971% increase from 2020.
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Annual (CNY)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 863 M -138 M -13.8% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 20-F 2024-04-25
2022 1 B +991 M +10026% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 20-F 2024-04-25
2021 9.88 M +8.96 M +971% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 20-F 2024-04-25
2020 923 K -3.66 M -79.8% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 20-F 2023-04-28
2019 4.58 M -24.7 M -84.4% Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 20-F 2022-04-28
2018 29.3 M -35.6 M -54.8% Jan 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 20-F 2021-04-28
2017 64.9 M -24.7 M -27.6% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 20-F 2020-04-24
2016 89.6 M -23.1 M -20.5% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 20-F 2019-04-10
2015 113 M +70 M +164% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 20-F 2018-04-24
2014 42.7 M +24.7 M +137% Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 20-F 2017-03-29
2013 18 M +649 K +3.74% Jan 1, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 20-F 2016-04-20
2012 17.3 M +7.46 M +75.6% Jan 1, 2012 Dec 31, 2012 20-F 2015-04-16
2011 9.88 M -4.77 M -32.6% Jan 1, 2011 Dec 31, 2011 20-F 2014-04-18
2010 14.7 M Jan 1, 2010 Dec 31, 2010 20-F 2014-04-18
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.