RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX) Current Ratio % [USD] 2014 - 2024

Historical data

Taxonomy & unit
ratio: %
Description
The current ratio is a liquidity ratio that measures a company's ability to cover its short-term obligations with its current assets.
Summary
RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. quarterly Current Ratio history and growth rate from 2014 to 2024.
  • RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. Current Ratio for the quarter ending March 31, 2024 was 128 %, a 21.2% decline year-over-year.
Current Ratio, Quarterly (% [USD])
Current Ratio, YoY Quarterly Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Date
Q1 2024 128 -34.6 -21.2% Mar 31, 2024
Q4 2023 138 -23.3 -14.5% Dec 31, 2023
Q3 2023 150 -6.52 -4.16% Sep 30, 2023
Q2 2023 166 +13.8 +9.09% Jun 30, 2023
Q1 2023 163 +13.2 +8.8% Mar 31, 2023
Q4 2022 161 +15.1 +10.3% Dec 31, 2022
Q3 2022 157 +10.8 +7.41% Sep 30, 2022
Q2 2022 152 +5.48 +3.74% Jun 30, 2022
Q1 2022 150 +6.65 +4.64% Mar 31, 2022
Q4 2021 146 +3.9 +2.74% Dec 31, 2021
Q3 2021 146 +5.68 +4.05% Sep 30, 2021
Q2 2021 146 +1.21 +0.83% Jun 30, 2021
Q1 2021 143 -4.53 -3.07% Mar 31, 2021
Q4 2020 142 -6.35 -4.27% Dec 31, 2020
Q3 2020 140 -19.2 -12% Sep 30, 2020
Q2 2020 145 -14 -8.77% Jun 30, 2020
Q1 2020 148 -11.7 -7.33% Mar 31, 2020
Q4 2019 149 -9.09 -5.76% Dec 31, 2019
Q3 2019 159 +7.98 +5.27% Sep 30, 2019
Q2 2019 159 -12 -7% Jun 30, 2019
Q1 2019 159 -31.7 -16.6% Mar 31, 2019
Q4 2018 158 -52.7 -25% Dec 31, 2018
Q3 2018 151 -63.8 -29.7% Sep 30, 2018
Q2 2018 171 -45.8 -21.1% Jun 30, 2018
Q1 2018 191 -33 -14.7% Mar 31, 2018
Q4 2017 211 -17.4 -7.64% Dec 31, 2017
Q3 2017 215 -25.3 -10.5% Sep 30, 2017
Q2 2017 217 -19.3 -8.17% Jun 30, 2017
Q1 2017 224 -3.01 -1.33% Mar 31, 2017
Q4 2016 228 +30.9 +15.7% Dec 31, 2016
Q3 2016 241 +31.6 +15.1% Sep 30, 2016
Q2 2016 236 +15.8 +7.16% Jun 30, 2016
Q1 2016 227 -1.89 -0.83% Mar 31, 2016
Q4 2015 197 -79.8 -28.8% Dec 31, 2015
Q3 2015 209 -46.6 -18.2% Sep 30, 2015
Q2 2015 220 Jun 30, 2015
Q1 2015 229 Mar 31, 2015
Q4 2014 277 Dec 31, 2014
Q3 2014 256 Sep 30, 2014
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.